Saturday, 1 August 2015

Motivating for Memory... (Part 2)


The potentially self-efficacy diminishing and consequently demotivating scenarios in the MFL classroom and potential strategies to ensure that students are being motivated by knowledge gaps and not demotivated by knowledge chasms…

Potentially Demotivating Scenarios In The MFL Classroom
Potential Motivating Strategy
Students not knowing where to begin on a written piece.
 
 
Use the ‘Break It Down’ technique7 as described in Teach Like a Champion (Lemov, 2010:88-92) to ‘Provide the missing (or first) step.’8 (Lemov, 2010:91). Depending on the written task, ask something like, “Well, what can we always start with to build a paragraph, the infinitive or a time phrase first?” Give students the option of one right, one wrong as a choice. Then practise the procedures to build a paragraph and get the student to repeat the procedures back to you. Ensure that the student has enough supporting material to help them build language . 
Students finding a reading text too hard. 
 
 
Make the content more accessible to the students to build their confidence and reduce cognitive load. A range of strategies could include; getting the students to write down a set number of words that they do know the meaning of before completing the task (with the teacher emphasising the words that the students do know) and looking the meaning of these up in pairs beforehand, getting the students to complete the task in pairs or as a FLA, practising VFLAs (my own term from Fun Learning Activities for MFL!) with some of the more demanding items of vocabulary to feature in the text beforehand and then practising retrieval until students have more knowledge.
Students finding a listening exercise too hard.
Again, make the content more accessible to the students to build their confidence. A range of strategies could include; playing the sound file more than twice, pausing more often, writing some of the key vocabulary and English on the board as the listening exercise runs so students see what they hear, practising VFLAs with some of the more demanding items of vocabulary to feature in the exercise beforehand and then testing students’ retrieval, using a range of ‘micro-listening strategies’9 (as referred to in Dr Gianfranco Conti’s blog) with the content on the listening task.   
Students getting a word meaning wrong, a verb ending wrong, pronouncing a word incorrectly etc. in front of the class.
Use a similar technique to those of the ‘Rollback’ and ‘Eliminate false choices’ techniques10 (Lemov, 2010:91) as described in the ‘Break It Down’ strategy in Teach Like a Champion to repeat back the student’s language errors to them. Lemov says, ‘…hearing your own error in another’s words is often revealing.’11 (idem) So if a student in French who was learning about infinitives for the first time found ‘boulanger’ in the dictionary and mistakenly thought that it was an infinitive, then eliminate some false choices. For example, saying, “What does ‘boulanger’ mean in English? If it were an infinitive, what would the English meaning always start with? Is there a ‘to’ at the start of the English meaning of ‘boulanger’ in the dictionary? If ‘boulanger’ means ‘baker’ then can I ‘to baker’? Can I go and say ‘I am going to baker’? I can say ‘I am going to bake’ but that’s a different word and it’s got a ‘to’ with it. Does ‘baker’ have a ‘to’ with it in the dictionary? So, therefore, can it be an ‘infinitive’?”
Students receive disappointing feedback on a test.
Avoid letting the student develop the mindset that failure is embarrassing or totally negative. Move the student’s focus on from ‘not being very good at languages’ to perhaps ‘not having been able to recall and apply the language in the correct way this one time’. Model your own past failures when learning languages. Model the skills that you also found difficult. Share in the fact that you also found this part of language-learning difficult when you were their age. Refer to the following line from Willingham, ‘When you fail-and who doesn’t?-let them see you take a positive, learning attitude.’12 (Willingham, 2009:185)    
 
All of this motivating for memory comes back to providing a task with the right level of support which is centred on students plugging their language knowledge gaps and not having to struggle to fill their knowledge chasms. An appreciation and awareness of the students’ language knowledge chasm would seem to be an essential factor in motivating students to learn languages...   

Notes (continued from Part 1)
7 Lemov, D. Teach Like a Champion: 49 Techniques That Put Students On The Path To College, Jossey-Bass, 2010, pp.88-92.

8 Lemov, D. Teach Like a Champion: 49 Techniques That Put Students On The Path To College, Jossey-Bass, 2010, p.91.

10 Lemov, D. Teach Like a Champion: 49 Techniques That Put Students On The Path To College, Jossey-Bass, 2010, pp.91.

11 Lemov, D. Teach Like a Champion: 49 Techniques That Put Students On The Path To College, Jossey-Bass, 2010, pp.91
12 Willingham, D.T. Why Don’t Students Like School?  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009, p.185.

Motivating for Memory…(Part 1)


Motivating for Memory…(Part 1)

I don’t know, I can’t remember.
Ok, that’s fine. No problem. How do you say ''I don’t know, I can’t remember. in Target Language?
I don’t know that, either.

In 2012 Dr Florentina Taylor and Dr Emma Marsden of the University of York undertook a study on students’ perception of MFL lessons and GCSE uptake and carried out a research report called,‘Influencing the perceived relevance of Modern Foreign Languages in Year 9: An experimental intervention 9’. In the summary conclusions of their study they stated that,
‘…Uptake appeared to depend mainly on pupils' perceptions of their usual MFL lessons at school.’1 (Marsden and Taylor, 2012)
In the Team MFL/MFLtwitterati, ALL-conquering and ALL-supporting environment we are in it is wonderfully reassuring to note the number of amazing initiatives to promote languages across the entire country. The numbers of events and staggering support is phenomenal; from Routes into Languages 2 to the World Languages project there are enough positives to shake a baguette at.  

I’m not dismissing all of the wonderful ways that promote languages in schools as a way to motivate students to opt. After all, a research report, entitled, Languages at key stage 4 2009: evaluation of the impact of the languages review recommendations: findings from the 2009 survey, also found the following, 
‘…factors thought to support uptake were extra-curricular activities (such as theatre visits, exchanges and trips), the availability of ICT resources, and promotional activities at KS3 (such as assemblies, language days and outside speakers).’2 (Filmer-Sankey and Marshall, 2010:19)
However, this piece focuses on certain aspects of what happens in the classroom to motivate students.
I’m not going to claim that we should all wear a Barcelona kit while we’re teaching and pretend to be Lionel Messi in the classroom to get students into languages though. (See the article on the ‘Lionel Messi effect’ in The Telegraph3 in 2014).

Before getting to what happens in the classroom let’s look at the current curriculum ahead of the 2016 changes as a demotivating factor for students learning languages. Taking the 2012 Language Trends’ survey as a starting point,  
‘By far and away the strongest message emerging was the dislike of existing ‘controlled assessments’ for GCSE speaking and writing (68 respondents from the state sector and 15 from independent schools – the largest number of comments from this sector). Respondents believed they were time-consuming for teachers, demotivating for learners and not a genuine test of linguistic competence:’4 (Board OBE and Kinsley, 2013:60)
Findings from the following report; Language Trends 2013/14 The state of language learning in primary and secondary schools in England also painted a worrying picture for motivating students to continue learning a language under the current system as one respondent in the survey put it,   

‘As the demands for memory skill in GCSE is so high, the least able have simply given up.’5 (Board OBE and Tinsley, 2014)
Here we go again. The demands for memory skill. It must be some form of irony that the complaints about the current system are forcing their way into our own long-term memories.
Agood job Controlled Assessment is going then, isn’t it?

Well, yes it is…but it doesn’t mean an end to teaching as a means of ‘motivating for memory’.
In Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn Hattie refers to Willingham by discussing that a reason why students don’t like school is because school makes students think and that our minds are not geared towards thinking. Hattie refers to thinking needing a lot of effort and goes on to say that this is related to how much we can recall from our long-term memories.6 (Hattie, 2014:5-6)

If ‘We are motivated by knowledge gaps, but put off by knowledge chasms’ (idem) as stated by Hattie then, put simply, why some students don’t like languages can be related to students’ suffering from a lack of enough language in their long-term memories and subsequent cognitive overload that their self-efficacy is undermined.
With all this in mind and my obsession with all things Doug Lemov and practice-related I’ve put down a few potentially self-efficacy diminishing and consequently demotivating scenarios in the MFL classroom and potential strategies to ensure that students are being motivated by knowledge gaps and not demotivated by knowledge chasms. These will be in the next post!
 
Notes
1 Taylor, F., & Marsden, E. (2012). Influencing the perceived relevance of Modern Foreign Languages in Year 9: An experimental intervention (Research report). York: Centre for Language Learning Research, University of York.                                                        
4 http://www.ucml.ac.uk/sites/default/files/lang%20trends%202012.pdf (accessed 9 July).
6 Hattie, J. and Yates, C.R.G., Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn, Routledge, 2014, pp.5-6.